China, which had already warned that any meeting could hurt already-strained relations between the two countries, quickly reiterated its call for the meeting not to go ahead. In a statement on Thursday White House spokesman Robert Gibbs confirmed that Barack Obama would meet the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader on February 18. "The Dalai Lama is an internationally respected religious leader. He's a spokesman for Tibetan rights," Robert Gibbs, a White House spokesman, said on Thursday. "The president looks forward to an engaging and constructive meeting." In a possible nod to Chinese sensitivities the meeting is scheduled to take place in the White House Map Room, and not the symbolic surroundings of the Oval Office, where Obama normally meets foreign dignitaries. 'High sensitivity' It is unclear as yet if Obama and the Dalai Lama, branded a separatist by the Chinese government, would meet in the open or behind closed doors.
"We urge the US side to fully understand the high sensitivity of Tibet-related issues, and honour its commitment to recognise Tibet as part of China and to oppose 'Tibet independence'," he said. He added that the meeting was a "wrong decision" and said it should be called off "to avoid any more damage to Sino-US relations". The 74-year-old monk fled his Tibet homeland to exile in India in 1959, after a failed uprising against Beijing rule some nine years after Chinese troops were sent to take control of the region. Strained ties Obama avoided meeting the Dalai Lama when he visited Washington last year. However in November the US president had warned Chinese leaders on a visit to Beijing of his intention to meet the exiled Tibetan leader. Next week's meeting comes at a time when China-US ties have become strained over several issues, including a $6.4bn arms sale to Taiwan, the self-governing island Beijing claims as its own. Relations have also been strained over internet censorship, with search giant Google Inc threatening to shut down its China business following what it said were cyber-attacks against the email accounts of rights activists. |
Saturday, 13 February 2010
Obama fixes date for Dalai Lama
Friday, 12 February 2010
10 Reasons Why a Google Fiber Network Could Reshape the ISP Landscape
News Analysis: Google announced recently that it plans to deliver a fiber network capable of delivering 1Gbps Web speeds. That's no small feat. The impact it could have on both the Internet and the tech industry as a whole cannot be understated. It could force changes in the entire U.S. ISP market, depending on whether Google eventually commits to widely deploying this 1Gbps network.
Google announced on Wednesday that it plans to deliver up to 1Gbps Web speeds to 50,000 people across the United States as part of an experiment to gauge the quality of next-generation apps, the viability of "new deployment techniques," and interest in "openness." Google might even ramp up availability to over 500,000 people in the U.S.
Google's announcement has sent shockwaves through the tech community. Just how much does Google plan to invest in its new fiber-optic deployment? How will major ISPs respond to the news? And perhaps most importantly, how will it impact the telecommunications industry? At this point, Google's exact intentions are unknown. But it could have a profound effect on the tech industry.
1. Speeds are abysmal
Around the U.S., Web speeds are abysmal. In many cases, the average American is lucky to get 10Mbps download speeds and 1Mbps upload speeds. It's a real issue. Other countries around the world are enjoying much faster speeds. And considering the Web is becoming increasingly crowded with large files, it's taking some folks much longer than they'd like to download those files. If Google can deliver 1Gbps download speeds, it would dramatically improve the average U.S. Web user's experience on the Internet.
2. ISPs don't seem to care
Unfortunately, most ISPs just don't seem to care that download speeds are not where customers would like them to be. Major ISPs, including Comcast and Time Warner Cable, have basically maintained status quo over the past couple years. And in some cases, those ISPs are limiting speeds on those that upload too many files each month. ISPs don't seem worried by this. Hopefully Google can make them realize that things need to change.
3. The market wants it
The market desires another company to come in and change things up. Current ISPs have been at it for too long without much competition. If Google can break into the market and offer dramatically improved speeds, companies like Time Warner Cable and Comcast will have no choice but to react. Having just a few companies dominating Internet access is a major issue for most Web users. Google is the only company that can address that.
4. Google has the cash to do it
Deploying a fiber-optic network to the home is an extremely costly endeavor. The immense cost has given ISPs a sense of comfort, knowing that the barriers to entry are so high, most companies will opt against deploying a network. But Google is different. It has the cash on hand—over $10 billion at last count—to invest in a full-scale fiber network without worry of losing everything. ISPs know that. And they are undoubtedly concerned. That's probably a good thing for Web users.5. It sets a precedent
By offering 1Gbps Web speeds, Google can set a precedent in the market. For once, ISPs will be required to play catch up. Once some users start talking about the incredible speeds Google is offering them, others will be jealous. They will speak out against their own ISPs. And it might cause Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and the others to finally get going on investing in infrastructure to deliver faster speeds. It might not be instant, but improvements will likely follow after Google unleashes its network.
6. The freshness of opennessAccording to its blog post, Google plans to deliver a spirit of openness with its network that Web users just haven't seen on the Web. Google's network will be "open access," which will allow users to choose an ISP from all those that use Google's network. For once, that openness might breed a sense of competition that seems to be lacking in the industry. ISPs are currently operating with little fear of competition. Google might be able to change that.
7. Passing savings on
Google also plans to try out savings ideas to limit the the deployment costs it will be required to pay for its network. Hopefully that means that those savings will be passed on to the Web user. In most cases, having such a hope wouldn't make sense when discussing thetelecommunications
industry. But Google is different. In several cases, it has changed the industries it competes in for the better. Hopefully it will follow suit in the telecommunications industry.
8. It could revolutionize the Web
If 1Gbps download speeds come to user homes, it could have a huge impact on the Internet. More advanced Web apps requiring better speeds could be offered. Larger files could make their way to the Web, making it a more preferred backup solution for any enterprise. Perhaps most importantly, it could challenge some Web developers to deliver experiences we haven't seen to this point. The Internet could be a different place after Google's network gets going.
9. Download speeds change everything
Download speeds could have a profound impact on the way users interact with the tech in their homes. According to Google, users could download movies from the Internet in "less than five seconds." Downloading HD films from a set-top box like the Apple TV would be more amenable to users. Google's 1Gbps connection could also affect the gaming world, making it possible for games to be delivered to users' homes over the Web, rather than require physical discs. Simply put, Google's download speeds could deliver exciting new advancements that could revolutionize the industry.
10. It's Google
Let's not forget that Google is the company behind the idea to deliver 1Gbps Web speeds. If it were an ISP or an unknown company, some might be suspect. But Google has a proven track record of delivering a service that people want to use. It also has the team and technical know-how to deliver on its promises. Whether or not Google's network will be available to just a handful of people or if its plan is part of a larger scale desire to take on ISPs is currently unknown. But if any company can revolutionize the telecommunications business, it's Google. It should be exciting to see what comes of its plans.
Google announced on Wednesday that it plans to deliver up to 1Gbps Web speeds to 50,000 people across the United States as part of an experiment to gauge the quality of next-generation apps, the viability of "new deployment techniques," and interest in "openness." Google might even ramp up availability to over 500,000 people in the U.S.
Google's announcement has sent shockwaves through the tech community. Just how much does Google plan to invest in its new fiber-optic deployment? How will major ISPs respond to the news? And perhaps most importantly, how will it impact the telecommunications industry? At this point, Google's exact intentions are unknown. But it could have a profound effect on the tech industry.
1. Speeds are abysmal
Around the U.S., Web speeds are abysmal. In many cases, the average American is lucky to get 10Mbps download speeds and 1Mbps upload speeds. It's a real issue. Other countries around the world are enjoying much faster speeds. And considering the Web is becoming increasingly crowded with large files, it's taking some folks much longer than they'd like to download those files. If Google can deliver 1Gbps download speeds, it would dramatically improve the average U.S. Web user's experience on the Internet.
2. ISPs don't seem to care
Unfortunately, most ISPs just don't seem to care that download speeds are not where customers would like them to be. Major ISPs, including Comcast and Time Warner Cable, have basically maintained status quo over the past couple years. And in some cases, those ISPs are limiting speeds on those that upload too many files each month. ISPs don't seem worried by this. Hopefully Google can make them realize that things need to change.
3. The market wants it
The market desires another company to come in and change things up. Current ISPs have been at it for too long without much competition. If Google can break into the market and offer dramatically improved speeds, companies like Time Warner Cable and Comcast will have no choice but to react. Having just a few companies dominating Internet access is a major issue for most Web users. Google is the only company that can address that.
4. Google has the cash to do it
Deploying a fiber-optic network to the home is an extremely costly endeavor. The immense cost has given ISPs a sense of comfort, knowing that the barriers to entry are so high, most companies will opt against deploying a network. But Google is different. It has the cash on hand—over $10 billion at last count—to invest in a full-scale fiber network without worry of losing everything. ISPs know that. And they are undoubtedly concerned. That's probably a good thing for Web users.5. It sets a precedent
By offering 1Gbps Web speeds, Google can set a precedent in the market. For once, ISPs will be required to play catch up. Once some users start talking about the incredible speeds Google is offering them, others will be jealous. They will speak out against their own ISPs. And it might cause Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and the others to finally get going on investing in infrastructure to deliver faster speeds. It might not be instant, but improvements will likely follow after Google unleashes its network.
6. The freshness of opennessAccording to its blog post, Google plans to deliver a spirit of openness with its network that Web users just haven't seen on the Web. Google's network will be "open access," which will allow users to choose an ISP from all those that use Google's network. For once, that openness might breed a sense of competition that seems to be lacking in the industry. ISPs are currently operating with little fear of competition. Google might be able to change that.
7. Passing savings on
Google also plans to try out savings ideas to limit the the deployment costs it will be required to pay for its network. Hopefully that means that those savings will be passed on to the Web user. In most cases, having such a hope wouldn't make sense when discussing the
8. It could revolutionize the Web
If 1Gbps download speeds come to user homes, it could have a huge impact on the Internet. More advanced Web apps requiring better speeds could be offered. Larger files could make their way to the Web, making it a more preferred backup solution for any enterprise. Perhaps most importantly, it could challenge some Web developers to deliver experiences we haven't seen to this point. The Internet could be a different place after Google's network gets going.
9. Download speeds change everything
Download speeds could have a profound impact on the way users interact with the tech in their homes. According to Google, users could download movies from the Internet in "less than five seconds." Downloading HD films from a set-top box like the Apple TV would be more amenable to users. Google's 1Gbps connection could also affect the gaming world, making it possible for games to be delivered to users' homes over the Web, rather than require physical discs. Simply put, Google's download speeds could deliver exciting new advancements that could revolutionize the industry.
10. It's Google
Let's not forget that Google is the company behind the idea to deliver 1Gbps Web speeds. If it were an ISP or an unknown company, some might be suspect. But Google has a proven track record of delivering a service that people want to use. It also has the team and technical know-how to deliver on its promises. Whether or not Google's network will be available to just a handful of people or if its plan is part of a larger scale desire to take on ISPs is currently unknown. But if any company can revolutionize the telecommunications business, it's Google. It should be exciting to see what comes of its plans.
Zahrain still chairman of IGP
GEORGE TOWN: Bayan Baru MP Datuk Seri Zahrain Mohd Hashim, who has been critical of Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, has not been sacked as the chairman of Island Golf Properties Bhd (IGP).
Lim said Zahrain was still chairman of the Penang Development Corporation (PDC) subsidiary “at the present moment.”
“PDC has informed me that no letter has been sent by either PDC or Island Golf Properties to any director of Island Golf Properties on any changes,” Lim said in a statement here yesterday.
He said Zahrain had been chairman and director of Island Golf Properties since July 9, 2008.
Zahrain claimed yesterday that he had been sacked as IGP chairman.
“Zahrain’s statement is a pack of lies,” Lim said.
Lim added that the PDC, which owns BJCC via its subsidiary Island Golf Properties Berhad, had decided to award the tender of managing BJCC to an experienced company valued at more than RM40mil.
Full details of the tender would be published after Chinese New Year in accordance with the state’s principles of Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT), Lim said.
He said certain actions and claims by Zahrain on IGP had compelled PDC to monitor it closely to ensure the company was run with the public interest at heart.
“PDC is concerned at how Zahrain is leading the IGP, when he and IGP recommended on Jan 12 last year that the operations of BJCC be outsourced and awarded to a company with a paid-up capital of RM2.
“To allow a RM2 firm to run BJCC, which involves expenditure involving millions of ringgit, makes a mockery of the open tender system. The company has no track record in running a golf club,” Lim said.
When contacted, Zahrain said: “If they have not sacked me so be it, but the issue is not about me but Lim’s arrogance and his dictatorial style in managing the state. I have reprimanded him, yet he remains stubborn.”
On the tender issue, Zahrain clarified that he only chaired board meetings.
“I don’t interfere with its daily operations. I am only paid allowances for the meetings. I have no hidden agenda, and to be accused of trying to push through a RM2 company is a fabrication. They are trying various ways to boot me out.
“I criticised Lim because I have the interests of PKR and the people at heart. Nothing more and nothing less,” Zahrain said.
Related post:
BJCC Golf and Country Club News
Let’s roar, not whimper
It’s time for the 40- and 50-somethings to stick their necks out and take the lead.
COME Sunday, it will be the first day of the Lunar New Year and it will be the start of the Year of the Tiger according to the Chinese 12-animal zodiac. This also means that this is my year as my zodiac sign is that of the Tiger.
This also means that I am 48 years old as I have gone through this cycle four times and the next time the tiger year comes around, I will be 60.
Over the past year, I have been brooding and dreading the coming of 2010 as it can only mean that I am going past mid-life still stuck in a crisis and it is going downhill after that.
However, as the Lunar New Year draws nearer, I find the gloom lifting and the rush of a new vigour of energy – it is as if I have gotten a shot of artificial booster to overcome anything that may stand in my way.
Maybe, this burst of adrenaline has got something to do with the fact that it has been over 40 days since I last had a cigarette, but I would like to think that the pending arrival of the Golden Tiger is responsible for my enthusiasm.
Those of us born in the 1960s are the country’s pioneers and I make no apology for this sweeping statement. We were the first lot to go through the change from English schools to Sekolah Kebangsaan.
We were the first to memorise and sing all those patriotic songs like Tanah Melayu, Malaysia Berjaya, Putera-Puteri, Barisan Kita and Muhibbah. We sang those songs with fervour and gusto although most of us did not understand the full meaning of those songs.
We were all schoolchildren when the race riots of May 13, 1969, broke out. It was our loss of innocence; suddenly we referred to each other in ethnic terms – most of the time in the rudest possible way. Overnight, we were a multi-racial country when prior to that we were just Malaysians.
Did we, children of the 1960s, have a choice in any of these things? No, we did not. The policies that followed and came about after May 13, changed our lives. Everything we did and were done to us was supposedly based on these policies by the people entrusted to implement them.
Sadly, today many of us realise that the implementers somewhat lost the plot along the way and carried out their duties over-enthusiastically and, in some cases, not in the spirit in which the policies were drawn up.
When we were old enough to realise that many of us had suffered at the hands of these zealots, we were so brow beaten that we, then the youth of the 1970s, just meekly accepted our misfortunes and avoided any confrontation when seeking our rights.
Instead, our parents found alternative routes and pathways for us. It was the same, regardless of we being Malay, Chinese or Indian, because then we left things to our parents to decide not knowing that they too were also experiencing these things for the first time.
For the non-Malay parents, they just drew on what they thought their fathers and mothers would have done – they prepared many of us to feel as though we were not going to stay on in Malaysia forever – they prepared us to be migrants.
For the Malays, because of the distrust created by the actual May 13 event and the propaganda that followed, the parents prepared the children to live without their non-Malay neighbours.
It would be easy for us today, with the benefit of hindsight, to judge everyone then – although some of us still cannot see clearly and are blinded by self-interest.
Then came the 1980s – the boom time for the world, where getting rich was the name of the game. We, the baby boomers, were just too busy making money to care about where Malaysia was heading or that there was a parallel economy in the country then.
Malaysia was flying high then but when we came crashing back to earth in the late 1990s the so-called Malaysian Dream was shattered. We left it to the politicians to resolve the problems, but instead they brought all of us into deeper conflict.
A decade later the same characters continued to dominate our lives when they should have faded away like bad nightmares.
We, who were born in the 1960s, are now fathers and mothers of children in their teens and twenties – the ages where their futures and thoughts are shaped.
In many ways they are luckier than us. They are more enlightened, and they also have more enlightened parents. The children born in the 1990s know what they want, and they know how to get it.
Unlike our parents, we must now stand up for them to ensure that none of them are deprived of anything that is rightly theirs. In a world where a country of 27 million is considered a small one, we must ensure not a single child of the 1990s is deprived at all. We are rich enough – in wealth and knowledge – to support everyone.
The May 13 incident brought about the New Economic Policy to ensure the fair distribution of wealth. I believed the policy is now outdated. I think Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak agrees with me because he will soon unveil the New Economic Model (NEM).
But this time as parents – not as politicians or technocrats – we must watch over the NEM policies like hawks to ensure that these are implemented as the authors meant them to be. We must be brave enough to shout out if we find any weakness in the implementation, and ensure it is fixed immediately.
We, the children of the 1960s, owe it to our forefathers to make sure the NEM works and ensure that their descendants will thrive in their homeland. No one should be made unwelcome. No Malaysian should be referred to as an immigrant anymore nor should any Malaysian feel threatened by another.
If we get it right, there is more than enough in Malaysia for everybody.
This is the year of the Golden Tiger and it is time for Malaysia and its people to roar.
Source: The Star Friday 12, 2010
> Deputy Executive editor Wong Sai Wan is going to miss his son when he leaves for Melbourne next week but prays that he will have a great Malaysia to come back to.
COME Sunday, it will be the first day of the Lunar New Year and it will be the start of the Year of the Tiger according to the Chinese 12-animal zodiac. This also means that this is my year as my zodiac sign is that of the Tiger.
This also means that I am 48 years old as I have gone through this cycle four times and the next time the tiger year comes around, I will be 60.
Over the past year, I have been brooding and dreading the coming of 2010 as it can only mean that I am going past mid-life still stuck in a crisis and it is going downhill after that.
However, as the Lunar New Year draws nearer, I find the gloom lifting and the rush of a new vigour of energy – it is as if I have gotten a shot of artificial booster to overcome anything that may stand in my way.
Maybe, this burst of adrenaline has got something to do with the fact that it has been over 40 days since I last had a cigarette, but I would like to think that the pending arrival of the Golden Tiger is responsible for my enthusiasm.
Those of us born in the 1960s are the country’s pioneers and I make no apology for this sweeping statement. We were the first lot to go through the change from English schools to Sekolah Kebangsaan.
We were the first to memorise and sing all those patriotic songs like Tanah Melayu, Malaysia Berjaya, Putera-Puteri, Barisan Kita and Muhibbah. We sang those songs with fervour and gusto although most of us did not understand the full meaning of those songs.
We were all schoolchildren when the race riots of May 13, 1969, broke out. It was our loss of innocence; suddenly we referred to each other in ethnic terms – most of the time in the rudest possible way. Overnight, we were a multi-racial country when prior to that we were just Malaysians.
Did we, children of the 1960s, have a choice in any of these things? No, we did not. The policies that followed and came about after May 13, changed our lives. Everything we did and were done to us was supposedly based on these policies by the people entrusted to implement them.
Sadly, today many of us realise that the implementers somewhat lost the plot along the way and carried out their duties over-enthusiastically and, in some cases, not in the spirit in which the policies were drawn up.
When we were old enough to realise that many of us had suffered at the hands of these zealots, we were so brow beaten that we, then the youth of the 1970s, just meekly accepted our misfortunes and avoided any confrontation when seeking our rights.
Instead, our parents found alternative routes and pathways for us. It was the same, regardless of we being Malay, Chinese or Indian, because then we left things to our parents to decide not knowing that they too were also experiencing these things for the first time.
For the non-Malay parents, they just drew on what they thought their fathers and mothers would have done – they prepared many of us to feel as though we were not going to stay on in Malaysia forever – they prepared us to be migrants.
For the Malays, because of the distrust created by the actual May 13 event and the propaganda that followed, the parents prepared the children to live without their non-Malay neighbours.
It would be easy for us today, with the benefit of hindsight, to judge everyone then – although some of us still cannot see clearly and are blinded by self-interest.
Then came the 1980s – the boom time for the world, where getting rich was the name of the game. We, the baby boomers, were just too busy making money to care about where Malaysia was heading or that there was a parallel economy in the country then.
Malaysia was flying high then but when we came crashing back to earth in the late 1990s the so-called Malaysian Dream was shattered. We left it to the politicians to resolve the problems, but instead they brought all of us into deeper conflict.
A decade later the same characters continued to dominate our lives when they should have faded away like bad nightmares.
We, who were born in the 1960s, are now fathers and mothers of children in their teens and twenties – the ages where their futures and thoughts are shaped.
In many ways they are luckier than us. They are more enlightened, and they also have more enlightened parents. The children born in the 1990s know what they want, and they know how to get it.
Unlike our parents, we must now stand up for them to ensure that none of them are deprived of anything that is rightly theirs. In a world where a country of 27 million is considered a small one, we must ensure not a single child of the 1990s is deprived at all. We are rich enough – in wealth and knowledge – to support everyone.
The May 13 incident brought about the New Economic Policy to ensure the fair distribution of wealth. I believed the policy is now outdated. I think Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak agrees with me because he will soon unveil the New Economic Model (NEM).
But this time as parents – not as politicians or technocrats – we must watch over the NEM policies like hawks to ensure that these are implemented as the authors meant them to be. We must be brave enough to shout out if we find any weakness in the implementation, and ensure it is fixed immediately.
We, the children of the 1960s, owe it to our forefathers to make sure the NEM works and ensure that their descendants will thrive in their homeland. No one should be made unwelcome. No Malaysian should be referred to as an immigrant anymore nor should any Malaysian feel threatened by another.
If we get it right, there is more than enough in Malaysia for everybody.
This is the year of the Golden Tiger and it is time for Malaysia and its people to roar.
Source: The Star Friday 12, 2010
> Deputy Executive editor Wong Sai Wan is going to miss his son when he leaves for Melbourne next week but prays that he will have a great Malaysia to come back to.
Thursday, 11 February 2010
Clouded leopard: First film of new Asia big cat species
| |
Earth News
The Sundaland clouded leopard, a recently described new species of big cat, has been caught on camera.
The Sundaland clouded leopard, only discovered to be a distinct species three years ago, is one of the least known and elusive of all cat species.
Two more rare cats, the flat-headed cat and bay cat, were also photographed.
 |  Clouded leopards are one of the most elusive cats. They are very hardly ever encountered  Andreas Wilting Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research |
"Clouded leopards are one of the most elusive cats. They are very hardly ever encountered and almost no detailed study about their ecology has been conducted," says Mr Andreas Wilting of the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research in Berlin, Germany.
Mr Wilting is leader of a project that evaluates how changes to the forest in the Malaysian part of Borneo impact carnivores living there.
As part of that project, the team places a network of camera traps in the forest, that automatically photograph passing animals.
The team, which includes the Malaysian field scientist Azlan Mohamed, also conducts regular surveys at night, by shining a spotlight from the back of a vehicle driven around the Dermakot Forest Reserve in Sabah.
|   |
"For the first eleven months we had not encountered a single clouded leopard during these night surveys," says Mr Wilting.
"So every one of our team was very surprised when this clouded leopard was encountered.
"Even more surprising was that this individual was not scared by the light or the noises of the truck.
"For over five minutes this clouded leopard was just roaming around the car, which compared to the encounters with the other animals is very strange, as most species are scared and run away after we have spotted them."
Film exists of a Sundaland clouded leopard held in an enclosure.
| RARE CATS: FIND OUT MORE |
Until 2007, all clouded leopards living in Asia were thought to belong to a single species.
However, genetic studies revealed that there are actually two quite distinct clouded leopard species.
As well as the better known clouded leopard living on the Asian mainland (Neofelis nebulosa), scientists determined that a separate clouded leopard species lives on the islands of Borneo and Sumatra.
The two species are thought to have diverged over one million years ago.
This leopard is now known as the Sunda or Sundaland clouded leopard (Neofelis diardi), though it was previously and erroneously called the Bornean clouded leopard.
Since 2008, it has been listed as vulnerable by the IUCN.
The clouded leopard, the largest predator on Borneo, appears to live at very low densities within the reserve, as it has only rarely been photographed by the researchers or camera traps.
During the surveys, the research team also discovered a juvenile samba deer (Cervus unicolor) which had been killed by a clouded leopard.
The scientists suspect a large male clouded leopard made the kill, and had removed part of the front right leg.
Despite being a commercial forest that is sustainably logged for wood, the Dermakot Forest Reserve in Sabah, which is an area of approximately 550km square kilometres, holds all five wild Bornean cat species.
Making its mark (Footage courtesy of A Wilting/A Mohamed/Cat News)
One video shows a wild leopard cat scent-marking its territory.
This smaller species is more common in the area, and has been filmed before.
"But due to its mainly nocturnal behaviour, specific behaviours like the scent marking are rarely documented on camera," says Mr Wilting.
More thrilling are the pictures taken of the other cats: the flat-headed cat (Prionailurus planiceps), bay cat (Catopuma badia) and marbled cat (Pardofelis marmorata).
 A marbled cat caught by a camera trap |
"The bay cat was special, as there has never been a confirmed record of this species in our study site.
"Therefore I really did not expect to get a photo of this species and I was amazed when I saw this picture."
Since 1928, there had been no confirmed record of this cat, before it was rediscovered in 1992 in Sarawak.
It is currently considered to be one of the world's least known cat species, and is listed as endangered.
"In addition our record is the most northern record of this species, which is endemic to Borneo."
Specialised climber
"Also the records of the flat-headed cat are very special as well, because just a few camera-trapping pictures of this species exist," explains Mr Wilting.
"The flat-headed cat is a highly specialised cat, restricted to lowland forests and wetlands, those areas which have the highest destruction rates in Asia.
 A flat-headed cat walks on by |
"The marbled cat is presumably mainly arboreal and therefore it is much harder to get this species photographed with the ground-based cameras."
The marbled cat looks much like a miniature clouded leopard, with a cloud-like spot pattern and long tail.
"We have encountered this species twice during our night surveys in Deramakot and once we even observed it climbing headfirst down the tree-trunk.
"These cats have really amazing climbing skills."
Mr Wilting says that finding all five Bornean cat species in one area suggests that Dermakot Forest Reserve is home to a particularly high diversity of animals, especially as Borneo is one of the biodiversity hotspots of the world.
It also suggests that even commercially used forests, as long as they are managed sustainably, may harbour threatened cat species and therefore contribute to their conservation, he says.
The true colour of politics is grey
Malaysians must learn to notice the difference between political posturing and real championing of the people’s interests.
A LEARNED and articulate friend who’s a veteran in the legal fraternity did not contain his disgust towards the mainstream media during our last lunch meet.
Clearly distracted from the sumptuous spread on his banana leaf, he let it all fly, accusing newspapers of breaching new levels of banality and unfairness.
It was obvious that much of his tirade had something to do with reports on the ongoing Anwar Ibrahim Sodomy II trial and coverage of stories about problems faced by PKR and DAP.
In a gist, his point was: There are so many things going wrong with the country – economic numbers are bad, FDIs are down and peoples’ problems are mounting, etc. – but the media are only focuses on making the Opposition look bad.
Never mind the fact that the topic of discussion during our previous lunch date was what made the headlines then: racist remarks by a former aide to the Prime Minister who has since resigned.
Of course, this comes from yet another of my friends who no longer reads the newspapers but “just skims through them” for the sake of knowing what it is being published.
Like him, many say that they now get all their reliable information on the Internet.
But not this well-travelled and learned friend of mine, though. He confesses to being not Net-savvy and admits to relying on what his friends read and tell him.
As such, he has full faith in highly reputable publications like The Washington Post, which ran a very presumptuous opinion piece titled Why the prosecution of Malaysia’s Anwar Ibrahim matters to the West.
He also rates another report about an Australian MP condemning the political persecution of PKR’s de facto leader.
Yes, this group of knowledgeable folk share their photocopied clippings to reaffirm what they already know, and verily and firmly believe.
Much to the amusement of our two other regular lunch partners – a retired film maker and a fellow journalist, my banter with my learned friend ended on the usual amicable note by both agreeing to disagree.
The only question that comes to this friend and several others who always seem to get angrier each time we meet, has always been this: When it comes to politics, why do so many academically brilliant and highly rated professionals choose to only see things in black and white?
Surely, they must know that it is mostly grey out there.
And that’s the reality for politics everywhere in the world, not just in this small and insignificant country of 27 million people.
Yes, we could have been a greater and much more respected nation by now, 53 years after independence, if our politicians in power had ensured that the country’s fundamental systems of justice and good governance remained strong, and had done more to unite rather than disunite our diverse ethnic groups.
Let’s be honest about the ills faced by the country. Are they really new problems and issues, much as many of us would like to trace them to the sacking of one man who was one step away from absolute power?
There are none so blind than they who will not see. If we care to look, the root causes of our problems can be traced back almost three decades.
Ironically, personalities who were creators of the problems or used the corrupt systems to their utmost benefits at the expense of the country are still around portraying themselves as saviours.
Racism? Religious extremism? Failed educational policies? Take your pick.
Those among us, who have always seen ruthless politicians for what they are know whom to point our fingers at.
It is tragic that Malaysians are increasingly being divided by political partisanship. On almost every issue we are being forced to take sides and choose which one to defend.
At the core of most issues, the two sides are not really different, but the players are letting us believe that we are looking at night and day. Are we really all that naive?
American writer Mary Beth Rogers said only two kinds of people can afford the luxury of acting on principle – those with absolute power and those with none and no desire to get any.
As she put it, everyone else who wants to be effective in politics “has to learn to be ‘unprincipled’ enough to compromise in order to see their principles succeed”.
That’s the reality of politics and it’s being played out before our eyes. There are no heroes and villains. They can be decent or vile as they come, and we must be able to accept them for what they are.
Politics, after all, is all about power plans and an extended exercise in ego. As long as there are followers, there will be leaders.
Ultimately, all Malaysians, especially the learned among us, need to do is to observe and notice the difference between political posturing and real championing of the people’s interests.
So, when the time comes, just vote wisely. There is no need to continuously rave and rant.
> Associate Editor M. Veera Pandiyan likes this observation of George Orwell: All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia.
A LEARNED and articulate friend who’s a veteran in the legal fraternity did not contain his disgust towards the mainstream media during our last lunch meet.
Clearly distracted from the sumptuous spread on his banana leaf, he let it all fly, accusing newspapers of breaching new levels of banality and unfairness.
It was obvious that much of his tirade had something to do with reports on the ongoing Anwar Ibrahim Sodomy II trial and coverage of stories about problems faced by PKR and DAP.
In a gist, his point was: There are so many things going wrong with the country – economic numbers are bad, FDIs are down and peoples’ problems are mounting, etc. – but the media are only focuses on making the Opposition look bad.
Never mind the fact that the topic of discussion during our previous lunch date was what made the headlines then: racist remarks by a former aide to the Prime Minister who has since resigned.
Of course, this comes from yet another of my friends who no longer reads the newspapers but “just skims through them” for the sake of knowing what it is being published.
Like him, many say that they now get all their reliable information on the Internet.
But not this well-travelled and learned friend of mine, though. He confesses to being not Net-savvy and admits to relying on what his friends read and tell him.
As such, he has full faith in highly reputable publications like The Washington Post, which ran a very presumptuous opinion piece titled Why the prosecution of Malaysia’s Anwar Ibrahim matters to the West.
He also rates another report about an Australian MP condemning the political persecution of PKR’s de facto leader.
Yes, this group of knowledgeable folk share their photocopied clippings to reaffirm what they already know, and verily and firmly believe.
Much to the amusement of our two other regular lunch partners – a retired film maker and a fellow journalist, my banter with my learned friend ended on the usual amicable note by both agreeing to disagree.
The only question that comes to this friend and several others who always seem to get angrier each time we meet, has always been this: When it comes to politics, why do so many academically brilliant and highly rated professionals choose to only see things in black and white?
Surely, they must know that it is mostly grey out there.
And that’s the reality for politics everywhere in the world, not just in this small and insignificant country of 27 million people.
Yes, we could have been a greater and much more respected nation by now, 53 years after independence, if our politicians in power had ensured that the country’s fundamental systems of justice and good governance remained strong, and had done more to unite rather than disunite our diverse ethnic groups.
Let’s be honest about the ills faced by the country. Are they really new problems and issues, much as many of us would like to trace them to the sacking of one man who was one step away from absolute power?
There are none so blind than they who will not see. If we care to look, the root causes of our problems can be traced back almost three decades.
Ironically, personalities who were creators of the problems or used the corrupt systems to their utmost benefits at the expense of the country are still around portraying themselves as saviours.
Racism? Religious extremism? Failed educational policies? Take your pick.
Those among us, who have always seen ruthless politicians for what they are know whom to point our fingers at.
It is tragic that Malaysians are increasingly being divided by political partisanship. On almost every issue we are being forced to take sides and choose which one to defend.
At the core of most issues, the two sides are not really different, but the players are letting us believe that we are looking at night and day. Are we really all that naive?
American writer Mary Beth Rogers said only two kinds of people can afford the luxury of acting on principle – those with absolute power and those with none and no desire to get any.
As she put it, everyone else who wants to be effective in politics “has to learn to be ‘unprincipled’ enough to compromise in order to see their principles succeed”.
That’s the reality of politics and it’s being played out before our eyes. There are no heroes and villains. They can be decent or vile as they come, and we must be able to accept them for what they are.
Politics, after all, is all about power plans and an extended exercise in ego. As long as there are followers, there will be leaders.
Ultimately, all Malaysians, especially the learned among us, need to do is to observe and notice the difference between political posturing and real championing of the people’s interests.
So, when the time comes, just vote wisely. There is no need to continuously rave and rant.
> Associate Editor M. Veera Pandiyan likes this observation of George Orwell: All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia.
Wednesday, 10 February 2010
Google Gmail tweak challenges Facebook, Twitter
MOUNTAIN VIEW, California (Reuters) - Google Inc is tapping its huge network of Gmail users and Web surfers to create a Buzz that it hopes will help it catch up with online social networking leaders Facebook and Twitter.
The world's No. 1 search engine on Tuesday launched Google Buzz, which allows users to quickly share messages, Web links and photos with friends and colleagues directly within Gmail, the company's popular email product.
Also, a new arsenal of products make the new social networking features compatible with mobile devices such as smartphones based on Google's Android operating system.
Google's new technology mimics some of the key features of popular social networking services like Twitter and Facebook, which are increasingly challenging Google for Web surfers' online time.
By integrating Buzz directly into Gmail, Google hopes to jumpstart its social networking push by leveraging the large pool of Gmail users.
"There's always been a giant social network underneath Gmail," said Google Product Manager Todd Jackson at a press event at Google's Mountain View, California headquarters on Tuesday.
Gmail is the third most popular Web-based email in the world, with 176.5 million unique visitors in December, according to comScore. Microsoft Corp's Windows Live Hotmail and Yahoo Inc's Mail were No. 1 and No. 2, with 369.2 million and 303.7 million unique visitors, respectively.
Google will roll out Buzz to Gmail users over the next few days, it said.
Status messages that users publish on Buzz and flag as viewable to everyone will be automatically indexed by Google's search engine and be available within Google's recently launched real-time search results. Google said users can also keep messages private by sharing only with customized groups of friends and colleagues.
Executives said users can easily share content from various Google online properties like photo-sharing service Picasa and video site YouTube.
Content from certain third-party services such as Twitter can also be shared, although users can only view Twitter messages -- or Tweets -- within Buzz and cannot publish new messages to Twitter's service.
Executives said that Buzz is not currently able to display messages that originated on Facebook, the world's No. 1 social network with 400 million active users.
"The fact that Gmail did not connect and allow broadcasts out to Twitter and Facebook could be a real challenge to them," said Forrester Research social media analyst Augie Ray. But he noted that Google's experience serving Web surfers' relevant search results could be a strength for the company in the social media segment as users are increasingly inundated with status messages.
Google has tried to ride the social networking wave before, launching the Orkut social network in 2004. But while Orkut is big in certain overseas markets like Brazil, it has failed to attract as many users as social giants like Facebook and MySpace in the United States.
In building a social network on top of an email product, Google is following in the footsteps of Yahoo, which has taken a similar approach in efforts to keep up with Facebook but has seen lackluster results according to analysts.
Google co-founder Sergey Brin said he was not deterred by other companies' experiences in melding email and social networking.
"I wouldn't discount something because it's similar in the one sense ... to something else in the past that may not be that successful," Brin said on the sideline of the event following the main presentations.
Google appears to be putting a heavy emphasis on mobile and location-based capabilities, weaving Buzz technology into the mobile versions of its flagship website and its online maps products. The company also announced a special mobile application for Buzz that will run on smartphones based on Google's Android software, Windows Mobile and the Symbian operating system.
Google shares rose $2.97 to close at $536.44 on Nasdaq.
(Additional reporting by Ian Sherr; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Richard Chang)
The world's No. 1 search engine on Tuesday launched Google Buzz, which allows users to quickly share messages, Web links and photos with friends and colleagues directly within Gmail, the company's popular email product.Also, a new arsenal of products make the new social networking features compatible with mobile devices such as smartphones based on Google's Android operating system.
Google's new technology mimics some of the key features of popular social networking services like Twitter and Facebook, which are increasingly challenging Google for Web surfers' online time.
By integrating Buzz directly into Gmail, Google hopes to jumpstart its social networking push by leveraging the large pool of Gmail users.
"There's always been a giant social network underneath Gmail," said Google Product Manager Todd Jackson at a press event at Google's Mountain View, California headquarters on Tuesday.
Gmail is the third most popular Web-based email in the world, with 176.5 million unique visitors in December, according to comScore. Microsoft Corp's Windows Live Hotmail and Yahoo Inc's Mail were No. 1 and No. 2, with 369.2 million and 303.7 million unique visitors, respectively.
Google will roll out Buzz to Gmail users over the next few days, it said.
Status messages that users publish on Buzz and flag as viewable to everyone will be automatically indexed by Google's search engine and be available within Google's recently launched real-time search results. Google said users can also keep messages private by sharing only with customized groups of friends and colleagues.
Executives said users can easily share content from various Google online properties like photo-sharing service Picasa and video site YouTube.
Content from certain third-party services such as Twitter can also be shared, although users can only view Twitter messages -- or Tweets -- within Buzz and cannot publish new messages to Twitter's service.
Executives said that Buzz is not currently able to display messages that originated on Facebook, the world's No. 1 social network with 400 million active users.
"The fact that Gmail did not connect and allow broadcasts out to Twitter and Facebook could be a real challenge to them," said Forrester Research social media analyst Augie Ray. But he noted that Google's experience serving Web surfers' relevant search results could be a strength for the company in the social media segment as users are increasingly inundated with status messages.
Google has tried to ride the social networking wave before, launching the Orkut social network in 2004. But while Orkut is big in certain overseas markets like Brazil, it has failed to attract as many users as social giants like Facebook and MySpace in the United States.
In building a social network on top of an email product, Google is following in the footsteps of Yahoo, which has taken a similar approach in efforts to keep up with Facebook but has seen lackluster results according to analysts.
Google co-founder Sergey Brin said he was not deterred by other companies' experiences in melding email and social networking.
"I wouldn't discount something because it's similar in the one sense ... to something else in the past that may not be that successful," Brin said on the sideline of the event following the main presentations.
Google appears to be putting a heavy emphasis on mobile and location-based capabilities, weaving Buzz technology into the mobile versions of its flagship website and its online maps products. The company also announced a special mobile application for Buzz that will run on smartphones based on Google's Android software, Windows Mobile and the Symbian operating system.
Google shares rose $2.97 to close at $536.44 on Nasdaq.
(Additional reporting by Ian Sherr; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Richard Chang)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)