China supercomputer design points to future speed kings

China’s new Nebulae Supercomputer is No. 2, right on the Tail of ORNL’s Jaguar in Newest TOP500 List of Fastest Supercomputers

Jack Dongarra, a professor at University of Tennessee's department of electrical engineering, says graphics chips will be used increasingly in supercomputers to boost performance.
(Credit: University of Tennessee)

China has muscled into the No. 2 spot on the list of the world's fastest supercomputers thanks, in part, to specialized Nvidia graphics chips: a technology that Intel is now pursuing to keep pace with this new trend in high-performance computing. 

China's Nebulae supercomputer is located at the recently constructed National Supercomputing Centre in Shenzhen, and achieved 1.271 petaflops/s (1.271 quadrillion floating point operations per second) running the Linpack benchmark, which put it in the No. 2 spot on the widely reported Top500 list. The latest list was formally presented Monday at the International Supercomputing Conference in Hamburg, Germany. (Jaguar, a Cray system at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, retained the top spot.)

Nebulae achieved this "in part due to its Nvidia GPU (graphics processing unit) accelerators...Nebulae reports an impressive theoretical peak capability of almost 3 petaflop/s--the highest ever on the TOP500," according to a press release Friday.

Though Nebulae also uses Intel Xeon processors, those are so-called commodity processors that are also employed in standard server computers. So, Intel--despite canceling its Larrabee graphics chip project--is pursuing a technology that leverages Larrabee R&D. On Monday, Intel said the first product of this kind, code-named Knights Corner, will be made on its future 22-nanometer manufacturing process--using transistor structures as small as 22 billionths of a meter--to pack more than 50 processing cores on a single chip.

On Tuesday, I spoke with Jack Dongarra, Distinguished Professor at University of Tennessee's Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and director of the Innovative Computing Laboratory. Dongarra introduced the LINPACK Benchmark, which is used as the primary yardstick to measure supercomputer performance.

Q: Are GPU accelerators in supercomputers a trend we'll see more of in coming years?

Jack Dongarra: This looks like this is going to be one of the modes of high-performance computing. Taking commodity processors (such as standard Intel or AMD server-class processors) together with specialized accelerators, in this case graphics processors.

How much do GPUs generally boost performance?

Dongarra: A board by Nvidia can give an order of magnitude greater performance than the commodity processor.

But programs must be written to take advantage of this, it just doesn't happen, correct?

Dongarra: There's nothing automatic about it. You have to write a program that explicitly passes information to the GPU and tells the GPU what to do. That can be easy or hard. In most cases it becomes a challenge to write an efficient program to do the operations. Part of the issue there is that the connection between the commodity part of the computer and the graphics processor is a very thin pipe. So, you have to pass information and think of a very thin straw through which you're passing a lot of information. And once you move it over there, you have to do a lot of operations to gain back any benefit.

And what's the future hold for GPU supercomputing?

Dongarra: Two things will happen. One, the connection will improve slightly. And then ultimately what's going to happen is that the graphics processor is going to be integrated into the commodity processor. So, you'll have a chip that has both the commodity processor's cores plus the graphics processors or an accelerator for doing floating-point arithmetic embedded into the chip itself. It's a path a number of companies are pursuing. Intel is one. AMD is another. Companies would like to pursue that path because it does provide the best performance but it does require another ratchet up in chip design.

Dongarra added that chips have been designed in the past with accelerators, though, of course, the chip-manufacturing technology at the time yielded different results. "There were companies that made these things that attached to mainframes," he said, citing Floating Point Systems, a company founded in 1970.

by Brooke Crothers, 

Brooke Crothers has been an editor at large at CNET News, an analyst at IDC Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, among other endeavors, including co-manager of an after-school math-and-reading center. He writes for the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET. Disclosure. 

Newscribe : get free news in real time

China’s new Nebulae Supercomputer is No. 2, right on the Tail of ORNL’s Jaguar in Newest TOP500 List of Fastest Supercomputers

Fri, 2010-05-28 00:31
 

HAMBURG, Germany—China’s ambition to enter the supercomputing arena have become obvious with a system called Nebulae, build from a Dawning TC3600 Blade system with Intel X5650 processors and NVidia Tesla C2050 GPUs. Nebulae is currently the fastest system worldwide in theoretical peak performance at 2.98 PFlop/s. With a Linpack performance of 1.271 PFlop/s it holds the No. 2 spot on the 35th edition of the closely watched TOP500 list of supercomputers.

The newest version of the TOP500 list, which is issued twice yearly, will be formally presented on Monday, May 31st, at the ISC’10 Conference to be held at the CCH-Congress Center in Hamburg, Germany.

Jaguar, which is located at the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, held on to the No. 1 spot on the TOP500 with its record 1.75 petaflop/s performance speed running the Linpack benchmark. Jaguar has a theoretical peak capability of 2.3 petaflop/s and nearly a quarter of a million cores. One petaflop/s refers to one quadrillion calculations per second.

Nebulae, which is located at the newly build National Supercomputing Centre in Shenzhen, China, achieved 1.271 PFlop/s running the Linpack benchmark, which puts it in the No. 2 spot on the TOP500 behind Jaguar. In part due to its NVidia GPU accelerators, Nebulae reports an impressive theoretical peak capability of almost 3 petaflop/s – the highest ever on the TOP500.

Roadrunner, which was the first ever petaflop/s system at Los Alamos in June 2008, dropped to No. 3 with a performance of 1.04 petaflop/s.

At No. 5 is the most powerful system in Europe -- an IBM BlueGene/P supercomputer located at the Forschungszentrum Juelich (FZJ) in Germany. It achieved 825.5 teraflop/s on the Linpack benchmark.
Tianhe-1 (meaning River in Sky), installed at the National Super Computer Center in Tianjin, China is a second Chinese system in the TOP10 and ranked at No. 7. Tianhe-1 and Nebulae are both hybrid designs with Intel Xeon processors and AMD or NVidia GPUs used as accelerators. Each node of Tianhe-1 consists of two AMD GPUs attached to two Intel Xeon processors.

The performance of Nebulae and Tianhe-1 were enough to catapult China in the No.2 spot of installed performance (9.2 percent) ahead of various European countries, but still clearly behind the U.S. (55.4 percent).

Here are some other highlights from the latest list showing changes from the November 2009 edition:

• The entry level to the list moved up to the 24.7 teraflop/s mark on the Linpack benchmark from 20 teraflop/s six months ago. The last system on the newest list would have been listed at position 357 in the previous TOP500 just six months ago. This replacement rate was far below average. This might reflect the impact of the recession and purchase delays due to anticipation of new products with six or more core processor technologies replacing current quad-core based systems. 
• Quad-core processor based systems have saturated the TOP500 with now 425 systems using them. However, processor with six or more cores per processor can already be found in 25 systems.
• A total of 408 systems (81.6 percent) are now using Intel processors. This is slightly up from six months ago (402 systems, 80.4 percent). Intel continues to provide the processors for the largest share of TOP500 systems. The AMD Opteron is the second most common used processor family with 47 systems (9.4 percent), up from 42. They are followed by the IBM Power processors with 42 systems (8.4 percent), down from 52.
• IBM and Hewlett-Packard continue to sell the bulk of systems at all performance levels of the TOP500. HP lost its narrow lead in systems to IBM and has now 185 systems (37 percent) compared to IBM with 198 systems (39.8 percent). HP had 210 systems (42 percent) six months ago, compared to IBM with 186 systems (37.2 percent). In the system category, Cray, SGI, and Dell follow with 4.2 percent, 3.4 percent and 3.4 percent respectively.
• IBM remains the clear leader in the TOP500 list in performance with 33.6 percent of installed total performance (down from 35.1 percent), compared to HP with 20.4 percent (down from 23 percent). In the performance category, the manufacturers with more than 5 percent are: Cray (14.8 percent of performance) and SGI (6.6 percent), each of which benefits from large systems in the TOP10.
• The U.S. is clearly the leading consumer of HPC systems with 282 of the 500 systems (up from 277). The European share (144 systems – down from 152) is still substantially larger then the Asian share (57 systems – up from 51). In Europe, UK remains the No. 1 with 38 systems (45 six months ago). France passed Germany and has now 29 (up from 26). Germany is still now the No. 3 spot with 24 systems (27 six months ago). Dominant countries in Asia are China with 24 systems (up from 21), Japan with 18 systems (up from 16), and India with 5 systems (up from 3).

The TOP500 list is compiled by Hans Meuer of the University of Mannheim, Germany; Erich Strohmaier and Horst Simon of NERSC/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; and Jack Dongarra of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. For more information, visit www.TOP500.org.

Newscribe : get free news in real time

BP's $70 billion whipping

 
Since April 20 when the Gulf oil spill began, BP shares have tumbled about 40%.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Despite the sharp fall in BP's share price following the company's inability to cap a leaking well in the Gulf of Mexico, most analysts say the selloff is overdone.

BP shares sank nearly 15% Tuesday after the company's latest attempt to seal the leaking Gulf oil well failed over the weekend. The selloff accelerated just before the closing bell, when U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced a criminal probe into the spill.

Since the accident happened April 20, which resulted in 11 deaths and an oil leak of up to 19,000 barrels per day, BP shares have fallen nearly 40%, wiping out nearly $70 billion in shareholder value. Before the accident the company had a market capitalization of nearly $183 billion. Now it's just below $115 billion.

Investors are concerned the clean up costs, lawsuits, and added restrictions from the spill, the worst in U.S. history, will sap BP's earnings potential.

Plus, like most big oil projects, BP is self-insured for the operation, so all of the costs of the cleanup and damages will fall on its shoulders.

No one knows how much the spill will eventually cost BP. Estimates have ranged from $3 billion to $25 billion - many fall somewhere in the middle. As of Tuesday BP said it has spent just shy of $1 billion on the accident.

0:00 /4:20Analyst: Oil spill could cost up to $30Bn

 

But whatever the price tag, it will likely be paid out over a period of years. For a company that made nearly $17 billion in profit last year and is expected to top $20 billion this year, most analysts say the stock hit is unjustified.

"They've got a balance sheet you could slap $20 billion of debt on and not miss a beat," said Mark Gilman, an oil and gas analyst with the Benchmark Co., a boutique broker-dealer. "We think the financial hit has been excessive."

Indeed, so do the majority of analysts.

In England, where BP (BP) is based, 38 analysts have a buy rating on the stock and eight have it as a hold. Only three recommend selling it, said Douglas Youngson, an oil analyst at Arbuthnot Securities, a London-based investment bank.

Beyond the clean up costs and lawsuits, there's also possible damage to BP's reputation. This is, after all, the company that branded itself an environmentally friendly oil firm, buying wind farms and solar arrays and adopting the slogan "Beyond Petroleum."

Will there there be a major public backlash?

"'Here in America we tend to have pretty short memories," said Ken Carol, an oil analyst at Johnson Rice & Co. "There was a big boycott after the Exxon Valdez, and they seem to be doing just fine now."

Satirists cash in on oil spill

 

Carrol also didn't think the spill would impact too heavily on BP's relationship with other oil companies. Because of the high up front costs to develop an oil field, many partners are often required on a project. In this case, BP had partnered with Anadarko (APC, Fortune 500) and the Japanese firm Matsui.

Many subcontractors are also brought in to work on an oil well. The primary subcontracts in this case were Halliburton (HAL, Fortune 500) and Transocean (RIG).

Might it be harder for BP to find partners in the wake of this disaster?

"BP has been a good partner before," said Carrol. "I don't think people will turn their backs on them."

Carrol said the selloff in BP's share price was likely overdone, but said he didn't expect it to get any better until BP can fix the problem.

As long as the well is leaking, the costs are adding up, he said.

Dissenting opinion

 

When BP will fix the problem is anyone's guess. The company is trying to put a new dome over the leak this week, but with several previous attempts to cap the well failing, that procedure looks like a long shot.

The company is saying it may not be able to stop the leak until August, when a relief well being drilled into the failed well's base is completed.

"That's two months of horrible images and horrific headlines," said Youngson, the analyst at Arbuthnot Securities.

Youngson is one of the few analysts that are recommending people sell BP's stock.

He thinks that in addition to the massive cleanup and liability cots, BP will face serious regulatory pressure going forward. That may mean a loss of leases in the Gulf of Mexico, and a loss of confidence from their peers.

"Anything BP does in the future will be under the microscope, and that will drive costs higher," he said.
Youngson also brought up another possibility that most other analysts have not openly talked about to date: That BP stock could get so cheap it might be the subject of a takeover.

He thinks if the stock falls much below $30 a share, BP will become a target. Shares traded around $38 Tuesday afternoon.


'If the share price continues to fall," he said, "other companies may see this for the bargain it will be."

By Steve Hargreaves, Senior writerJune 1, 2010: 4:52 PM ET
Newscribe : get free news in real time 

Clickjacking' worm hits hundreds of thousands on Facebook

'This girl gets OWNED.' And you can too

A vulnerability on Facebook forced hundreds of thousands of users to endorse a series of webpages over the holiday weekend, making the social networking site the latest venue for an attack known as clickjacking.

The exploit works by presenting people with friend profiles that recommend — or "Like," in Facebook parlance — links with titles including "LOL This girl gets OWNED after a POLICE OFFICER reads her STATUS MESSAGE." Those who click on the link see a page that's blank except for the words "Click here to continue." Clicking anywhere on the page automatically forces the person to add the link to his list of Likes.

Clickjacking is a term that was coined in late 2008 by web application security researchers Jeremiah Grossman and Robert "RSnake" Hansen. It describes attacks that allow malicious website publishers to control the links visitors click on. Virtually every browser is vulnerable, although many browsers come with safeguards that can make exploitation harder.

The Facebook worm that hit over the weekend superimposes an invisible iframe over the entire page that links back to the victim's Facebook page. As a result, as long as the person is logged in, his profile automatically recommends the link to new friends as soon as the page is clicked on.

Twitter was attacked by a series of clickjacking exploits last year that forced users to publish tweets against their will. The exploits stopped after company engineers finally tightened down their site. Facebook engineers will undoubtedly follow suit, if they haven't already. But this isn't the first time Facebook has been hit by clickjacking.

By Dan Goodin in San Francisco • Get more from this author
Newscribe : get free news in real time

Is China facing a Japanese bubble trap?

THINK ASIAN BY ANDREW SHENG

AS the world debates whether the renminbi (RMB) is undervalued, the real concern is whether after the RMB revalues, China will repeat the mistakes of Japan during the 1985 post-Plaza Accord period.

In that decade, the yen rose from roughly 240 yen to one US dollar to as low as 80 by August 1995 and then depreciated to 147 in June 1998 before joint intervention stopped the depreciation worsening the Asian crisis.

During this period, Japan suffered the worst asset bubble with the stock market falling by more than 80%, land prices falling by over 60% and the banking crisis took nearly a decade before it was finally resolved.

The Japanese public debt rose to nearly 200% of GDP, one of the highest in the OECD countries and Japan had almost zero growth for nearly two decades, as interest rates were kept near zero.

The worst part of the Japanese dilemma is that with a huge overhang of the public debt and an aging population, Japan may face both a decline in population and also an implosion in the wealth holdings if interest rates were to go back to global levels.

Note that unlike the US, which has a lot of foreign debt owed in US dollars, the high level of Japanese debt is yen debt owed to its own citizens.

There are many foreign commentators who think that after the recent increase in credit in the Chinese banking system, equivalent to nearly 40% of GDP, with a broad money to GDP ratio of 180% of GDP, that China may be facing a Japanese-style meltdown.

What is the truth and what is the correct analysis?

In the period 1950-70, Japan enjoyed high growth, high capital formation, rapid monetization and rising property prices, very similar to what China is going through.

The interesting point is that monetization did not appear to be highly inflationary, so in the run-up to 1989 at the height of the asset bubble, the Bank of Japan was initially reluctant to raise interest rates.

Exactly like what happened with the US subprime bubble, there was also insufficient regulatory action to stop banks exposing themselves to real estate loans. Koyo Ozeki is Japan analyst for PIMCO and his analysis in December 2009 is very illuminating (www.pimco.com).

The amount of bank lending equivalent to nearly 40% of GDP also went into Japanese real estate between 1985 to mid-1990s.

In the case of Japan, most of it went into commercial real estate. Real estate loans to individuals for mortgages only accounted for 20% of the total credit growth.

What was interesting was his comparison of Japan (1985-91), US (2000-2007) and China (2003-2009).
During these periods, Japan and US grew roughly by 3% per annum, whereas China grew by 10%.

Real estate bubbles during this period were roughly 2 times in price growth for China and the US, but 5 times in the case of Japan.

He felt that since in China “there is overwhelming shortage of residential property that meets its new living standards; it will likely take a considerable amount of time for supply to catch up to demand.”

He “sees little risk in the foreseeable future that increase in loans to the real estate sector will pose a threat to the financial system”, but also recognizes that “a rapid increase in lending could lead to a rise in bad debt in the future.”

What were the Japanese policy mistakes during the bubble period and what can we learn from this?
One of the most distinctive features of the Japanese experience was how long it took to bring the banking crisis under control.

It was almost eight years after the bubble burst in 1989 before the first serious failures of banks forced the government to use public funds to prevent the meltdown in the banking system.

Hiroshi Nakaso, formerly from the Bank of Japan, wrote probably the best technical analysis of this experience for a paper for BIS in 2001.

Part of the problem was that no one understood the scale of the losses because there was a paradigm shift.
Richard Koo, the chief economist of Nomura Securities, called this a “balance sheet deflation”.

No one understood how serious the real estate bubble had on the balance sheet of the banking system.

I have argued that the real estate bubble is the elephant in the room – no single government department is in charge and current fragmented monetary and regulatory theory grossly underestimates the importance of real estate as collateral for companies and bank loans, income for local governments and wealth of households.

So when the real estate bubble burst, the damage to household, corporate, government and bank balance sheets is huge, but the effects may take a while to recognize in accounting terms.

Ozeki (2008) noted that it took the Japanese government a long time to recognize the asset deflation because most people assumed that the property prices would turn around after such low interest rates.

Secondly, the Japanese banks had large latent profits from their holdings of corporate shares that everyone assumed that they could cushion themselves from the asset losses. But the more the banks sold the shares, the lower the stock market prices became, creating a downward spiral in confidence and growth.

Thirdly, the cumulative bad debt problems were as large as 25-30% of GDP, in addition to actual write-offs amounting to 20% of GDP.

No one has an accurate number on the massive deflation of the Japanese real estate bubble.

Assuming that the US real estate/GDP ratio of 225% of GDP was the ratio for Japan in 1989 and prices deflated by 60%, then the wealth loss could be as high as 130% of GDP. Because these were commercial real estate, most of the losses were borne by the corporations, and those who could not finance their losses transferred it to bad debt for banks.

Given the fact that the banks had capital not more than 10% of GDP, it was not surprising that the Japanese banking system could not by themselves get out of the bad debt burden without large fiscal help.

Most analysts identify the new credit in China as being given to local government financing vehicles. This is the topic that I shall discuss in the next article.

> Datuk Seri Panglima Andrew Sheng is adjunct professor at Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, and Tsinghua University, Beijing. He has served in key positions at Bank Negara, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, and is currently a member of Malaysia’s National Economic Advisory Council. He is the author of the book “From Asian to Global Financial Crisis”.

Sime Darby dethroned

PETALING JAYA: Sime Darby Bhd has been dethroned as the largest company on the FTSE Bursa Malaysia KL Composite Index (FBM KLCI) and now occupies third place after having shed close to RM5.89bil in market capitalisation over the last one month.

Instead, Malayan Banking Bhd (Maybank) now reigns as the largest company on Bursa Malaysia with a market cap of RM50.54bil as at May 27.

Second spot is held by CIMB Group Holdings Bhd with a market cap of RM47.89bil.

Over the last four weeks, Sime Darby’s shares have shed some 98 sen, and it now has a significantly lower market cap of RM47.05bil compared with RM54.15bil six months ago.

The selldown in Sime Darby was perpetuated by the discovery of RM964mil in provisions, which caused investors to lose confidence in and rush to dump the stock.

Maybank’s market cap has in fact increased by RM2.2bil over the last six months on the back of operational improvements.

It recently reported third quarter to March 31 net profit of RM1.03bil, which was 105% higher than the previous corresponding period.

The nine-month cumulative period saw net profit rise to RM2.9bil, driven by higher growth in all sources of operating revenue and a lower loan loss provision.

Since May 13, the FBM KLCI has retraced 77.76 points to 1,269.16. On a year-to-date basis, it is lower by a mere 6 points from 1,275 on Jan 4. The FBM KLCI’s impact on Malaysia’s 10 largest companies has not been quite as bad.

On a six-month basis, five of these companies have still managed to increase their market cap despite the volatility.

MISC Bhd has been a winner and looks poised to become one of the world’s largest tank terminal operators, having entered into a conditional sale and purchase agreement with Vitol Group for the acquisition of a 50% stake in VTTI BV worth some RM2.4bil.

VTTI is one of the largest independent tank terminal operators in the world with a network of terminals spreading across 11 countries.

“This buy serves to expand significantly MISC’s existing tank terminal operations − currently two terminals, one each in Tanjung Langsat and Tanjung Bin. We understand that VTTI’s current tank terminal capacity of 5 million cu m is expected to rise to 8 million cu m by 2012,” said an analyst from AmResearch.

Significantly, IOI Corp Bhd has lost close to RM5bil in market cap at RM31.76bil. On Wednesday, IOI touched a 10-month low of RM4.67 in intra-day session following more selling pressure.

The efficient planter reported a decline in earnings from its plantations division in the quarter ended March 31, down 12% to RM282.02mil.

This was due to lower operating profit from the low crop season which also coincided with the hot weather, further aggravated by the recent El Nino phenomenon. The industry is expected to feel the heat of the weather anytime from six to 24 months.

Meanwhile, Axiata Group Bhd is enjoying a good run, with its market cap gaining some RM5bil to RM31.64bil, as net profit ballooned to RM921.5mil for the first three months from RM63.9mil a year ago.
This was boosted by higher sales from overseas units and disposal of shares in Indonesian subsidiary, PT XL Axiata Tbk.

XL Axiata has been performing better than expected on the back of the telco industry in Indonesia undergoing a revolution of data usage.

This phenomenon started when BlackBerry and iPhone handsets flooded Indonesia last year. There has been a surge in data revenue, mainly from Internet access charges, via the 2G platform.

By TEE LIN SAY
linsay@thestar.com.my

 SIME :  [Stock Watch]  [News]

Tapping young investors

OPTIMISTICALLY CAUTIONS BY ERROL OH

IN this week’s Monday Starters column in StarBiz, deputy executive editor Soo Ewe Jin wrote about Bursa Malaysia’s goal of getting more young adults to invest in our stock market. One suggestion from the exchange is that people should buy stocks for their children so as to kindle an interest in share investing at an early age.

It’s a modest step but the ideas behind it are important – that we should start young and that parents have a major role in shaping their kids’ attitudes towards investments. If we lose sight of these, it’s the equities market that may suffer.

To maintain its liquidity and vibrancy, our stock exchange needs a healthy proportion of buying and selling by individual investors. Last year, retail participation accounted for a third of the trading value in Bursa Malaysia’s securities market.

It’s an improvement from the 24% recorded in 2008, but still a long way from the 60% level seen about a decade ago.

In trying to draw in retail investors, Bursa Malaysia is targeting the youthful set. In the chief executive officer’s message in the exchange’s annual report 2009, Datuk Yusli Mohamed Yusoff wrote: “We are cognisant that we need the young generation investor base.”

Recent market research commissioned by the bourse found that there’s a generation gap in the Malaysian share investing arena.

The findings are presented in a booklet published as part of Bursa Malaysia’s Rethink Retail project.

According to Omar Merican, the exchange’s chief operating officer, the project’s aim is “to reach out to younger audiences to create more awareness on the capital market and how they can become more involved”.

The research has determined that investors aged between 20 and 29 make up almost 30% of the investing population but only 12% of share investors. Most of the other share investors (nearly 60%) are at least 40 years old.

It’s not that the young don’t have the money to invest in shares. They prefer to seek returns from other avenues – savings accounts, unit trust, investment-linked insurance and property.

Says Yusli in the booklet’s foreword: “We believe the future growth lies with the young Malaysian segment that is the untapped potential for the growth of this industry. There is, however, a challenge in getting more youngsters interested in viewing share investing as an option to building their investment portfolio.”

There’s a perception problem here. The research shows that the majority of young potential investors are intimidated by the risks associated with shares. They think investing in futures, options and foreign currency is less risky.

They see share investing in Malaysia as having “a strong speculative character”, and some liken it to gambling.

Just where did they get that notion? We should look at the dominant component of the share investing population – those who are 40 and above. And most of them are, in fact, parents.

Are these moms and dads teaching their children about investing in the stock market? Are they imparting the skills and knowledge that come through the experience of riding the ups and downs of the market?

If the parents cum share investors are not doing enough to help their children develop a firm understanding of share investing, the likely issue here is that they’re poor at engaging with and relating to the kids. Or maybe the parents don’t know all that much about investing in stocks.

Or could it be that parents think that share investing is so tough and perilous that don’t fancy the idea of the children going into it, in the same way that a smoker won’t encourage his child to start lighting up? If that’s the case, that’s just bad parenting – “Yes, I do it, but that doesn’t mean you should.”

There’s another possible reason for the young people’s aversion to share investing. They do passively learn about it from their parents, except that they largely pick up on the negative aspects.

The Rethink Retail booklet hints at that: “The speculative image (of share investing in Malaysia) is further fuelled with the emotional success and failure stories told by friends, family, colleagues and others”

And let’s not forget that some investors don’t rely on fundamentals and diligence. Instead, they trade based on tips and rumours. What conclusions will a child form about share investing when he often hears his parents spouting lines such as “Can still go in. They’ll push it up to RM4.30.” or “The general election is coming. The share price will surely fly?”

Bursa Malaysia has plans to convert youngsters into share investors.

In the booklet’s conclusion, the stock exchange says: “If we are able to reach out to potential investors, especially the young investors, we can change their perceptions of share investing and make shares an option to savings, deposits, property, unit trust and investment-linked insurance.”

Sure, Bursa Malaysia can do this on its own. Still, it wouldn’t hurt if the parents buy into the programme as well. But for that to happen, the parents must first believe that stocks are solid long-term investments as long as everybody plays by the rules. Now that’s the real challenge, isn’t it?

>Deputy executive editor Errol Oh is working on a pre-schoolers’ book on the stock market, tentatively titled The Stock That Sank Like A Rock. But he’s stuck because he can’t find simple, familiar words that rhyme with ‘Bursa’, ‘dividends’, ‘warrants’ (nope, ‘blackcurrants’ doesn’t work in this context) and ‘unusual market activity’.

Technology Can Save Money, Planet

We must act in order to preserve our planet. This is self evident. One interesting aspect of this important endeavor, in which we all should take part, is that you may help accomplish it by saving money.

Imagine this, you are taking good care of yourself, your pocketbook, you become more generous and this contributes to life on our planet. Let's see, if we do not spend on things that are not really needed, we save money. Therefore, we have more resources (maybe money) to spend on those things that really are important: health, leisure, study, travel, giving, etc. - quality of life. Sounds like good business, doesn't it?

Interestingly, an Internet trend based on this reasoning is gaining momentum -- examining it provides us with interesting examples and opportunities for action. This new trend is called SaaS, an acronym for "Software As A Service". Note the philosophy: why buy word a processor or spreadsheet if you can use them at Google Docs, that you access only when needed? Google's word processor and spreadsheet is a classic example of SaaS. The advertisers pay Google (dearly) so that you have this service for "free."

Well, you can say there is the Open Office, it is free, I agree, but what about disk space? To spend it on something you use occasionally? Use this space for the software you really always use, even if for fun stuff - our hard drives should not be a software cemetery. Via SaaS you have one more gain: your spreadsheets or documents are always at your disposal anywhere in the world and ready to use.

With SaaS it is easy to see the saving action effect. Indeed, if we just need to access the Internet, our computer (laptop, notebook or desktop) can be simpler and cost much less. This equation in itself points to computers becoming cheaper, therefore generating greater social inclusion, more business, more opportunities, etc. And more, light computers use less electricity.

And guess what? This trend is global and irreversible; SaaS is here to stay. SaaS will more than double by 2012, said the analysis firm Gartner in a report last year. There a lot of other providers of SaaS as well. Just two weeks ago, at Intermodal South America, I met people offering something I never thought about. My interview with them is embedded below.

A World Free of Nuclear Weapons

February 2010

Since the first atomic bombs exploded in 1945, some have tried to rid the world of nuclear weapons. President Obama has embraced this goal with new vigor. This issue of eJournal USA examines the challenges to achieving nuclear disarmament. It conveys the hopes of some thinkers, and explains the doubts of others.

Well, back to saving money, resources and the planet we live in. Think about your purchases, and consider the developments that each will cause. Stay tuned, pay close attention to the chain of events that every product you buy follows. Be aware of where the garbage you generate goes, how much space will it use, how often you will really use what you plan buy and so on. Once more, try to see that what you buy doesn't become garbage at all - be generous. That attitude of intelligent saving on everything you bring home (like in your computer) will change the entire planet.

©2010 OhmyNews

Other articles by reporter Antonio Carlos Rix Newscribe : get free news in real time