It’s a perennial problem – more top scorers than places at
public universities for medicine, dentistry and pharmacy. The cheapest
route to these degrees is fraught with uncertainties and heartache.
IT costs the government about RM70,000 a year to train a medical
student at a public university. That works out to RM350,000 for a
five-year course.
But a student who gains a place at one of the dozen public
institutions offering medicine forks out less than RM20,000 in total
tuition fees; the rest is subsidised by the Government.
Does it not then make sense for any brilliant student whose family
cannot afford the RM350,000 to RM1mil for a private or foreign degree to
spend two years doing Form Six and sitting for the STPM?
Everyone knows that the STPM or Malaysian Higher School Certificate
is seriously tough, more difficult to excel in than the internally
examined Matriculation offered mainly at matriculation colleges where
90% of the students are bumiputra.
That is why every student who slogs away and scores the maximum CGPA
of 4.0 feels “cheated” of the cheapest route to a medical degree when
they fail to secure a place at a public university.
This applies to other critical courses like dentistry, pharmacy and
certain branches of engineering too. When even those with a CGPA
(Cumulative Grade Point Average) of 4.0 don’t make the grade for
medicine, they will be “dumbed down” to take up their second and third
choices of the critical courses; and in the process, raise the cut-off
point for these courses.
The spillover effect will be felt by those with lower CGPA scores
who had hedged their bets by applying for dentistry and pharmacy.
This translates to more applicants crying foul because they didn’t
get their course of choice despite having almost perfect scores.
There is also a perceived lack of transparency in the information
made available for “strategic” application on the part of STPM students.
For one, while STPM results are made public, matriculation results
are not. (Last year, there were 83,000 Form Six and 26,000
matriculation students.)
As an STPM candidate, you don’t know where you stand against the
others competing for the limited places. In 2004, for example, when
“Medic blues” (same issue of top scorers not getting into medicine) made
headlines, there were 527 STPM students with CGPA 4.0 but more than
double (1,247) with the same grade via matriculation.
For STPM students who may take up to five subjects, their CGPA
scores are calculated based on the best four subjects, including General
Studies.
The results of students from both “streams” are merged into a master list for allocation of places in universities.
Perfect score students failing to get their preferred course – this year, some were offered nothing – is a perennial problem.
But it is more acute in a year when the STPM yields better results
while the number of places remain static. A total of 442 who sat the
exam last year scored 4.0 compared with 300 the year before.
Last week, Higher Education Department director-general Prof Datuk
Dr Morshidi Sirat said in a statement that 41,573 of STPM, matriculation
and Asasi (Centre for Foundation Studies) students were successful in
gaining admission to 20 public institutions of higher learning.
According to UPU, the coordinating body for intake into public
universities, on its Facebook page, there are more than 2,500 (including
the 442 from STPM) applicants with a CGPA of 4.0, most of whom applied
for competitive courses like medicine, dentistry and pharmacy.
But the number of places allocated for the three courses in all
public universities is just 1,078 or less than half the number of
perfect top scorers! Imagine the competition, what more for the 699
medical places. It’s 699, 119 and 260 respectively.
If this is an annual predicament, can’t more places be opened up at public and private institutions?
In terms of physical infrastructure, it is possible, although the
intake is strictly guided by criteria set by the Malaysian Medical
Council. Student-lecturer ratio must match the facilities provided.
But the problem lies in academic staffing and the limited places for clinical training at teaching hospitals.
If public universities are bursting at the seams, the same may not be the case at private universities.
If the Government subsidises a student’s tuition fees at a private
university like it does in public universities, more places can
definitely be made available.
What the country needs is “good financial modelling”, says Taylor’s
University vice-chancellor and president Prof Datuk Dr Hassan Said.
Private institutions too would like to have top scorers enrolled in
their medical courses and raise the competition among their students,
making it a win-win situation.
Should supply meet demand?
That is a question the Health Ministry has to grapple with. Are
there more students who want to be doctors than the country needs?
Currently, doctor-patient ratio in Malaysia is 1:800. We are
expected to achieve the 1:600 ratio recommended by the World Health
Organisation (WHO) by 2015.
With the 3,500 doctors (via public and private institutions) that
the country is producing annually, the Health Ministry expects to hit
doctor patient ratio of 1:400 by 2020, which will exceed WHO’s
recommendation.
Doctor wannabes should bear in mind that getting a job may not be as
easy in future although the country still lacks specialists.
For medicine, scoring 4.0 may be the main hurdle but it is only the
first hurdle. Participation in co-curricular activities also contributes
10% to the total points for entry into public universities.
Universities today want some say on who should join their most
competitive course and put candidates through aptitude tests and
interviews.
While there are calls for universities to do away with the
“subjective” interviews, those in the medical faculties feel strongly
that this is the most effective way to gain a snapshot of a candidate.
Does he really want to be a doctor or is there parental pressure?
In private institutions like Monash University Sunway campus, an
applicant has to go through four “mini” interviews – 10 minutes each
with four interviewers separately.
Its head of the Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicines and Health
Sciences Prof Datuk Dr Anuar Zaini Md Zain shares that the interviews
are designed to be as objective and reliable as possible.
He says they are looking for the ability to communicate, empathise, work in a team, and have real expectations of the job.
“You need to be able to communicate and listen or you won’t be able
to know your patient’s problem. In fact, the biggest complaint against
doctors is that they don’t talk and can’t communicate.
“English proficiency is really important as teaching is mainly in
that language, whether in clinical years or post-graduate training
anywhere in the world,” says the former medical dean of Universiti
Malaya.
Basically, interviews are not designed to fail an applicant but to
help weed out the wrong candidates and reduce the attrition rate among
medical students.
While it is costly for universities to conduct interviews for every
applicant, it will be even costlier for them – and society in the long
run – to train the wrong person.
Common Sen-se By Leanne Go
> Twelve years ago, I wrote a comment on the problem of top
STPM scorers not getting their course of choice and titled it “Study
hard, come out on top and be let down”. Looks like little has changed.
Feedback is welcome at leanne@thestar.com.m
Top scorers appeal cases after not being offered any courses
KUALA LUMPUR: They are among the brightest students in the country
and yet were deemed not good enough for local public universities.
Eight students who scored cumulative grade point average of 4.0 were
not offered any courses at the public universities despite successfully
submitting their forms to enter the universities.
They are among the 108 appeal cases that MCA has received from
students who sat for the STPM and matriculation programme since the
issue was highlighted last week. Of the total, 55 have 4.0 CGPA.
MCA education bureau chairman Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong said he could
not accept the Education Ministry’s excuse that technical error was
among the reasons why many top scorers either failed to obtain places at
public universities or did not get courses of their choice.
“They obtained 4.0 CGPA. Don’t tell me they do not know how to fill a form.
“I cannot accept this silly explanation. It is grossly unfair to the
students,” he said after meeting 22 students and their families at
Wisma MCA yesterday.
Dejected lot: MCA education bureau chairman
Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong looking at the top scorers’ results. — AZLINA
ABDULLAH / The Star
His remarks at the press conference were greeted by applause from those present.
Further substantiating his point over the issue of technical error,
Dr Wee pointed out that 16 of the 22 students were called for an
interview with Universiti Sains Malaysia.
“If it was a technical error, how could USM call them for an interview?” he asked.
He said the party would seek the help of Prime Minister Datuk Seri
Najib Tun Razak and Education Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin to
resolve the issue.
Najib, in a tweet, said he knew some were disappointed at not getting places in universities.
“But don’t give up. (I) will discuss at Cabinet this week how best to help these students,” he said.
MIC national youth council member G. Kalaicelvan said the MIC
received many complaints of top Indian students not getting courses of
their choice.
“Most want to do medicine and their STPM results meet the
requirement but somehow they do not get a place in the public
universities,” said Kalaicelvan.
He said many Indian students end up disappointed after the STPM results are out every year.
“It’s a never-ending problem,” he said.
- The Star/Asia News Network
Related posts:
Give top students scholarships !
Top Malaysian Chinese students rejected by public universities
Beware of Malaysian Chinese school leavers being lured into dubious degree and diploma proggrams!
